Hong Kong’s asset management industry has long catered to a well-defined clientele: high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) and institutional investors. However, seismic shifts in the city’s demographic and economic landscape are challenging this traditional focus. With an influx of Mainland Chinese professionals, a rising cohort of young, digitally native investors, and evolving wealth distribution, asset managers must rethink their approach to audience targeting—or risk losing relevance in a rapidly diversifying market.
READ MOREHong Kong’s asset management industry, long shaped by global giants like JPMorgan Asset Management, Schroders, and Fidelity, is undergoing a seismic power shift. A new wave of local and regional players—from homegrown Value Partners to Chinese powerhouses like ChinaAMC and Korean entrants such as Mirae Asset—are aggressively carving out market share. This clash between entrenched international firms and ambitious challengers raises a critical question: In a market where trust and relevance are paramount, what strategies will define the next era of dominance?
READ MOREETFs have mastered the art of speaking directly to investors. Through social media campaigns, educational webinars, and bite-sized digital content, ETF providers like BlackRock’s iShares or Vanguard bypass intermediaries to build brand loyalty. This approach creates a “always-on” relationship, fostering trust and familiarity. By contrast, active funds often depend on third-party distributors (e.g., private banks, advisors) to reach clients—a model that distances them from end investors and limits their ability to control messaging.
ETFs thrive on agility. They leverage real-time market trends (e.g., ESG, AI hype) to launch targeted campaigns, capitalizing on investor sentiment. Their marketing is inherently participatory, engaging users through interactive tools, performance dashboards, and even meme culture. Active funds, however, often default to static narratives about historical returns or star portfolio managers—messages that feel impersonal in an era where investors crave autonomy and immediacy.
While active funds argue that intermediaries add value through personalized advice, this reliance comes at a cost. Distributors prioritize products that align with their commercial goals, not necessarily those best suited to clients. Worse, active funds cede ownership of client relationships, making it harder to differentiate themselves in a crowded market
The ETF boom is as much about marketing innovation as it is about cost. Active funds don’t need to abandon distribution networks, but they must rethink how they connect with investors in a world where transparency, accessibility, and storytelling drive decisions. The future belongs to firms that blend human expertise with the spontaneity of digital engagement—whether they’re awking ETFs or active strategies
To reclaim relevance, active funds must adopt a hybrid approach:
Build Direct Digital Channels: Create investor portals, podcasts, or newsletters to educate and engage audiences independently.
Embrace Niche Storytelling: Highlight specialized expertise (e.g., active stewardship in volatile markets) rather than generic “outperformance” claims.
Leverage Data-Driven Insights: Use analytics to identify and target micro-segments of investors with tailored content.